<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NLP and presenting with impact</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pegasusnlpblog.com/nlp-and-presenting-with-impact/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pegasusnlpblog.com/nlp-and-presenting-with-impact</link>
	<description>practical nlp applications &#38; ideas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 04:57:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SimonRoskrow</title>
		<link>http://pegasusnlpblog.com/nlp-and-presenting-with-impact/comment-page-1#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>SimonRoskrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 12:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pegasusnlpblog.com/?p=165#comment-163</guid>
		<description>In response to the request for other presenting ticks, I had the dubious pleasure of a day long presentation designed for new school governors earlier this week.In addition to being a great demonstration of poor tonality, pace, eye contact and so on, the (ex-teacher) presenter insisted on clicking his fingers repeatedly to get a response to questions he was asking. It was like being back at school, in a rather poor lesson...

I&#039;d also like to offer my support to Graham&#039;s comment - feeling passionate about a subject generally leads to much more engaging delivery, as passion is hugely infectious. I believe that presenters can get away with a few of the &quot;obvious&quot; errors if they are personally excited about their topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to the request for other presenting ticks, I had the dubious pleasure of a day long presentation designed for new school governors earlier this week.In addition to being a great demonstration of poor tonality, pace, eye contact and so on, the (ex-teacher) presenter insisted on clicking his fingers repeatedly to get a response to questions he was asking. It was like being back at school, in a rather poor lesson&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also like to offer my support to Graham&#8217;s comment &#8211; feeling passionate about a subject generally leads to much more engaging delivery, as passion is hugely infectious. I believe that presenters can get away with a few of the &#8220;obvious&#8221; errors if they are personally excited about their topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reg</title>
		<link>http://pegasusnlpblog.com/nlp-and-presenting-with-impact/comment-page-1#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 22:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pegasusnlpblog.com/?p=165#comment-158</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re absolutely right, Graham. Walking your own talk makes a huge difference. 

It moves the tips in the newsletter from being just at the Behavoural and Skills levels of the Personality Map (Neuro-Logical Levels) to being at the Beliefs and Identity levels. 

If you believe in what you say this comes across non-verbally and impacts your audience - if you don&#039;t... ditto!
So that&#039;s got to be a given - the bottom line. 

Yet, even if you believe in your message, missing out on the other practical skills points makes it more difficult for your audience to buy you - and therefore more difficult for them to buy your message. 

We often have a very finite time slot in which to make a good impression so let&#039;s use everything that helps. Perhaps it&#039;s not a matter of &#039;either or&#039; but of &#039;and and&#039; - i.e. walking the talk... and doing it skillfully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re absolutely right, Graham. Walking your own talk makes a huge difference. </p>
<p>It moves the tips in the newsletter from being just at the Behavoural and Skills levels of the Personality Map (Neuro-Logical Levels) to being at the Beliefs and Identity levels. </p>
<p>If you believe in what you say this comes across non-verbally and impacts your audience &#8211; if you don&#8217;t&#8230; ditto!<br />
So that&#8217;s got to be a given &#8211; the bottom line. </p>
<p>Yet, even if you believe in your message, missing out on the other practical skills points makes it more difficult for your audience to buy you &#8211; and therefore more difficult for them to buy your message. </p>
<p>We often have a very finite time slot in which to make a good impression so let&#8217;s use everything that helps. Perhaps it&#8217;s not a matter of &#8216;either or&#8217; but of &#8216;and and&#8217; &#8211; i.e. walking the talk&#8230; and doing it skillfully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham</title>
		<link>http://pegasusnlpblog.com/nlp-and-presenting-with-impact/comment-page-1#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 20:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pegasusnlpblog.com/?p=165#comment-157</guid>
		<description>I think that all these ideas are excellent and if you can make them work for yourself, you will do a great job.  People become Presidents just because they master these things. 

There is something I would like to add, which for me was a critical turning point, and that is belief in what I was saying, at least at the time I was saying it.  If you really believe in what you are saying, and you present your material in a genuine way, your audience will be on your side.  
I had all the training you could find on things such as eye-contact, pacing, tonality and so on and I tried hard to use it but I never felt right.  It was only when I decided to put all this know-how to one side and talk about what I really believed that it came together.  And then a strange thing happened  -  all the know-how came back and fell into place. 

I think Reg is exactly right when he says that people buy people first.  I think the key to that is to be genuine and if you are seen as such then all the stumbles and stutters in your presentation will not even be noticed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that all these ideas are excellent and if you can make them work for yourself, you will do a great job.  People become Presidents just because they master these things. </p>
<p>There is something I would like to add, which for me was a critical turning point, and that is belief in what I was saying, at least at the time I was saying it.  If you really believe in what you are saying, and you present your material in a genuine way, your audience will be on your side.<br />
I had all the training you could find on things such as eye-contact, pacing, tonality and so on and I tried hard to use it but I never felt right.  It was only when I decided to put all this know-how to one side and talk about what I really believed that it came together.  And then a strange thing happened  &#8211;  all the know-how came back and fell into place. </p>
<p>I think Reg is exactly right when he says that people buy people first.  I think the key to that is to be genuine and if you are seen as such then all the stumbles and stutters in your presentation will not even be noticed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 3/9 queries in 0.030 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 297/300 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via N/A

Served from: pegasusnlpblog.com @ 2012-05-20 12:31:45 -->
